Attachment Tax Reform
Individual payroll taxes. These are optional taxes for Old Age and Survivors Insurance after age 60 (or 62). The collection of these taxes occurs if an income sensitive retirement income is deemed necessary for program acceptance. The ceiling should be lowered to $75,000 reduce benefits paid to wealthier individuals and a floor should be established so that Earned Income Tax Credits are no longer needed. Subsidies for single workers should be abandoned in favor of radically higher minimum wages.
Income Surtaxes. Individual income taxes on salaries, which exclude business taxes, above an individual standard deduction of $75,000 per year, will range from 6% to 36%. This tax will fund net interest on the debt (which will no longer be rolled over into new borrowing), redemption of the Social Security Trust Fund, strategic, sea and non-continental U.S. military deployments, veterans’ health benefits as the result of battlefield injuries, including mental health and addiction and eventual debt reduction.
Asset Value-Added Tax (A-VAT). A replacement for capital gains taxes, dividend taxes, and the estate tax. It will apply to asset sales, dividend distributions, exercised options, rental income, inherited and gifted assets and the profits from short sales. Tax payments for option exercises and inherited assets will be reset, with prior tax payments for that asset eliminated so that the seller gets no benefit from them. In this perspective, it is the owner’s increase in value that is taxed. As with any sale of liquid or real assets, sales to a qualified broad-based Employee Stock Ownership Plan will be tax free. These taxes will fund the same spending items as income or S-VAT surtaxes. This tax will end Tax Gap issues owed by high income individuals. A 24% rate is between the GOP 20% rate and the Democratic 28% rate. It’s time to quit playing football with tax rates to attract side bets.
Subtraction Value-Added Tax (S-VAT). These are employer paid Net Business Receipts Taxes that allow multiple rates for higher incomes, rather than collection of income surtaxes. They are also used as a vehicle for tax expenditures including healthcare (if a private coverage option is maintained), veterans' health care for non-battlefield injuries, educational costs borne by employers in lieu of taxes as either contributors, for employee children or for workers (including ESL and remedial skills) and an expanded child tax credit.
The last allows ending state administered subsidy programs and discourages abortions, and as such enactment must be scored as a must pass in voting rankings by pro-life organizations (and feminist organizations as well). An inflation adjustable credit should reflect the cost of raising a child through the completion of junior college or technical training. To assure child subsidies are distributed, S-VAT will not be border adjustable.
The S-VAT is also used for personal accounts in Social Security, provided that these accounts are insured through an insurance fund for all such accounts, that accounts go toward employee-ownership rather than for a subsidy for the investment industry. Both employers and employees must consent to a shift to these accounts, which will occur if corporate democracy in existing ESOPs is given a thorough test. So far it has not.
S-VAT funded retirement accounts will be equal dollar credited for every worker. They also has the advantage of drawing on both payroll and profit, making it less regressive.
A multi-tier S-VAT could replace income surtaxes in the same range. Some will use corporations to avoid these taxes, but that corporation would then pay all invoice and subtraction VAT payments (which would distribute tax benefits. Distributions from such corporations will be considered salary, not dividends.
Invoice Value-Added Tax (I-VAT) Border adjustable taxes will appear on purchase invoices. The rate varies according to what is being financed. If Medicare for All does not contain offsets for employers who fund their own medical personnel or for personal retirement accounts, both of which would otherwise be funded by an S-VAT, then they would be funded by the I-VAT to take advantage of border adjustability. I-VAT also forces everyone, from the working poor to the beneficiaries of inherited wealth, to pay taxes and share in the cost of government.
Enactment of both the A-VAT and I-VAT ends the need for capital gains and inheritance taxes (apart from any initial payout). This tax would take care of the low income Tax Gap.
I-VAT will fund domestic discretionary spending, equal dollar employer OASI contributions, and non-nuclear, non-deployed military spending, possibly on a regional basis. Regional I-VAT would both require a constitutional amendment to change the requirement that all excises be national and to discourage unnecessary spending, especially when allocated for electoral reasons rather than program needs.
As part of enactment, gross wages will be reduced to take into account the shift to S-VAT and I-VAT, however net income will be increased by the same percentage as the I-VAT. Adoption of S-VAT and I-VAT will replace pass-through and proprietary business and corporate income taxes.
Carbon Value-Added Tax (C-VAT). A Carbon tax with receipt visibility, which allows comparison shopping based on carbon content, even if it means a more expensive item with lower carbon is purchased. C-VAT would also replace fuel taxes. It will fund transportation costs, including mass transit, and research into alternative fuels (including fusion). This tax would not be border adjustable.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home